Saturday, January 8, 2011

How I do Doubles with Models

 Happy New Year!


From Polaroid Minolta Pro


 2011 has brought me to a point in my life where I want to share more. I have spent the last two years shooting like crazy and I'm not taking any time to review what I've learned or to record it anywhere. I have a few notes in my flickr stream that help remind me and share some basic info.

  I think it's time for more. So this year I am aiming to write down the lessons I learn, as I learn them. Weekly, I will be posting shots I took and what I got out of it. Hopefully, this will be helpful to others out there, but also serve to review what I'm running up against and succeeding in.

  So there is something I've been playing with since May of 2010. I started trying to shoot people in a studio setting. Nothing fancy, mind you. I just have a second bedroom I set up as a studio with a few things.

 I knew I was going to try and use models as something central to double with textures and other  background items. To make sure they stood out and had plenty of negative space to fill with the 2nd exposure, I bought a few yards of Black felt from a craft store. It took about 8 yrds of felt to cover 1/4 of the walls a ceiling in the room. So the corner is black and doesn't reflect much light, now.

  I started working with friends and girlfriends to just have fun in the studio. No pressure for results. I used my LC-A+ for these. I use a Lomography ringflash for my light source. The connection on the hot shoe adapter is bad and is no longer reliable. It would also block my viewfinder, which was annoying. So I use it off camera and I have found this to present me with a many more lighting options. Since I use an off camera flash, that I have to trigger manually, I shoot in the dark.

  I don't mind telling you, it is a bit odd to stand in the darkness joking with your models. It usually takes about 3-4 minutes and our eyes have adjusted and see each other. I have a light on in the living room, so there is a bit of ambient lighting. We're not blind in there.

-  My first real session was with Sky Taylor. I had covered the wall but not the ceiling, yet. So I ended up with a lot of white ceilings coming through in this roll. Lesson learned. I had a roll of Fuji MS 100/1000 that had already been exposed in Las Vegas. I was nervous about how the cross processing would affect the colors, for some reason. I wish now that I had crossed the hell out of this. It would have had such lovely tones. I had shot the glass flowers in the ceiling of the Bellagio reception area.


Sky had little experience modeling and I had none with models. We started off with her in a bikini.I wasn't sure how much the glass flowers were going to come through on the multi iso film. Sometimes they were brighter than others.


Here is a accidental ceiling shot but I was surprising her with silly string in the dark. So after this roll came back, I swore to always cross process. I always end up missing the colors. I also covered the whole 1/4 of the room in felt instead of just a section of the wall.

-  The next session I had was with an old friend, Jolie Gracey-Musick. She worked at an ice cream shop with me for a while. Now she's a burlesque dancer. She volunteered to help me out. I used Fuji Sensia 400 and Kodak Ektachrome 100VS. 

  She and I laugh a lot so we had a great rapport. She's been doing burlesque long enough that modeling came pretty easy. I used the ringflash again. The first roll I shot on the Ektachrome 100VS. The LC-A+ has a fixed aperture of 2.8. You can run into some real focus problems if you are shooting at three feet and don't keep tight to that. Several shots came out slightly more blurry than I would like. I triple exposed this roll. Jolie was the first layer, then I shot the blinds in my friend's house on a lunch break. On the way back from the lunch break, I shot a layer of asphalt with a wrist twist. 

This is what it looks like with some sky doubled over it.

 So three layers got a little bright, even for 100 iso film.
With just a diffuser over the flash

With a red gel over the ring flash.

The Sensia 400 roll was shot randomly through two days, before I shot with her. There were several accidents on this roll that made me very happy. I had shot this with the diffuser off of the ring flash, accidentally, I had them pull the roll a stop to keep it from being blown out. 
I love the snarl mixing with the cacti.

This was a really lucky match up. Accidents are my best friend!

The take away from this batch was to be more cautious with my selection of textures for triple exposures. The blinds and the spinning asphalt was too busy together. It all might have been fixed if the binds had been 3-4x as wide. I also learned to let go and not always plan my doubles. Accidents couold be better than my intentions.

  I have a roll I shot under water with a model, Teresa may Nichta, but hardly anything was salvageable from the roll. I used a 100 iso film with a flash that was too weak, under water. Then I exposed a parking garage interior for too long. 

Here is one of the only shot where you can see what I was going for. Not the most flattering shot of her. She would soon forgive me and shoot again. We had much better results.

  Next, I should warn you, are some shots that are a bit more...naked. My ex-girlfriend, this last summer, was very eager to pose for me. Harmony. I had mentioned an interest in shooting someone with less clothes. So I apologize to those sensitive ones who may think of this as anything but art. 

  We shot two rolls. Fuji Sensia 200 and Sensia 400. I used gold sequines thrown in the air and manually popped a Holgon flash with an orange gel. The background was the black felt corner.

I had used a panel of red LEDs to create the red blur off of her and used a diffused ringflash.

  
From Harmony-Sequins         
Here was just the ringflash and no LED panel.

The Sensia 400 roll was shot with a texture of water spraying from a hose into my dad's yard at night. I just changed gels on the colorsplash flash randomly. 

From Harmony-Showers
She went through different yoga positions for me. There was an orange gel on the flash, this time.

Here the water almost looks like stars. No gel on the flash. Sensia 400 really makes the skin tone green in Kodka C41 chemicals.

 This session really let me understand better use of a models whole body to generate a shot. I didn['t need just head and shoulder perspective. I needed full interactive sessions to really capture someone. Clothes or not, the whole person is important.

-  The next shoot was with Cate Blouke. She does some stage acting and was happy to mug for my camera. I used some more Fuji Sensia 400. It really high-lites red colors while leaving everything else a more uniform tone. I loaded the roll in my Canon EOS Rebel 2000 and laid out some red LED xmas lights. I had to use the Canon as I didn't know what distance to capture the lights in an out-of-focus state or bokeh. I shot the strand of lights on a black felt sheet. and exposed the film for about 1/15 of a sec. I don't know how to set the aperture on my Canon. That thing is too complex for me. So I don't know how tight the aperture was. I rewound the roll and strung it into my LC-A+.

I went to a craft store and bought some red, yellow, and orange feathers. Getting these thrown over her right was harder than I thought it would be.



From LR- Cate vs Bokeh
I have some silly headgear I buy when I see it in stores.

  I'll be honest, I didn't learn as much from this session. I was starting to get more comfortable with giving direction to models. Asking for an emotion or body position wasn't as awkward. Kate was a natural that took direction well.

  Next week I will show you what happened when I met a body painting artist who wanted me to catalog her work with some double exposures. More ladies but wearing only paint. I mixed them with Las Vegas, water lily pads, Round Rock, TX, and Downtown Austin. Things get better looking when I have a second session with Jolie and Teresa. It only goes up from here. Stay tuned!

  As always, thanks for reading. You can follow my current process on 

Sunday, December 19, 2010

My Pummelvision


Awesome new service. Pummelvision takes all of your flickr stream (or Facebook photos) and edits it into a strobe of memories. 1500 photos in 3 1/2 minutes.

www.pummelvision.com

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

I Just Finished My Book!

I just finished my book! After a month and a half of hard work. I have pieced together an 80 page 8"x10" hardcover book with the best of my lomography and Polaroid work. It has over 170 pictures with titles, film type, and the story/tips about the shot. It will be launching at the same time as my first solo show, on Aug 30th.


Both encapsulate my first year and a half in film photography. 

Below is a preview of the book.


...and my hands were like fireworks by Cameron Russell | Make Your Own Book

  You can buy it through blurb, or you can see me at my show and try and get one of the last 5 from the 20 we ordered. The first 10 were pre-ordered before I had even finished.


 
  There will be over 70 pieces mounted on bamboo, transferred onto aluminum, and bursting through pixilated clouds.
Join Us at the Lustre Pearl in Austin, TX Aug 30th from 7-11.

 




Monday, July 26, 2010

How I Began & Why I love Multiple Exposures





Why Do I Love Multiple Exposures?


I could give you bullet points or number the reasons out for you.

It's not that organized.

It's like a gambling addiction. It's like x-mas/Hanuka/Kwanzaa. It's like a blind date.

You know what your heart is asking for. You know what your eye wants to see. You know what you want those spinning fruits should look like after you pull the metal arm using your last quarter.

You don't know till you see it from the film lab. There is a surprise in Multiple Exposures that no other photography gives you.

More importantly:

I want to shoot what isn't there. What's in our minds. Melding images together the way our memories come to us. Not clear sharp pictures, but thoughts and emotions bleeding into each other tangentially. Cued by images from our that temporal experience. When you remember a party, you don't remember a single picture of everyone dancing in the living room. You remember the soft but dirty couch you sat on, the ugly chandelier that lit the room, a tree you stared at while sharing a cigarette outside, that one really funny guy you met while waiting in line at the keg, the hallway to the bathroom you walked down too many times, an ugly rug, and that tattoo on that girl's back you couldn't stop staring at all night. It all melds together into one impression.

That's what Multiple Exposures can do that singles can't.

Capture life the way you remember it and not the way it happened.




Let me start with how I found out about this whole analog camera/Lomography movement and tell you what ensnared me. I probably should have started the blog this way. Seems important, now that more people are asking me about it.

My phone has apps. One of them was a filter app for your camera. Different effects. I wanted that. Better than the average pics it already took. I picked up CameraBag. It had an option called Helga. I thought the effect was very cool. Neat colors and some darkening around the edges.

At this point in my life, Oct. '08, I had a small digital point and shoot my dad gave me a year before. I had used disposable cameras at summer camp and had dad's old Advantix camera in my closet. I was of the mind that cameras got in the way of enjoying vacations. Of enjoying the moment. I chose not to carry one. The digital fit in my bag I always have with me. I used to it chronicle my trips and taking pictures of myself jumping on hotel beds.



It was fun but it wasn't more than something to do because it was silly and everyone needs new social network pics. Around that same year, I had my friend tell me about the concept of "Shutter Drag" or dragging shutter. I realized there was things outside the normal realm of photography. I hadn't seen much art photography or had any favorite photographers. I started using dragging shutter to create odd light drawings with the ambient light sources around me. I just set the little digital to fireworks mode and adjust the seconds it stayed open. I ended up with things like this:



So, in a way, I was already starting to look for specific things when I was out at a concert. Weird lights I could point my camera at and move it around. It wasn't something I thought much about. I was just another person with a digital camera. Taking pictures of bands I saw, wheatpastes, graffiti on trains as they pass...

But Now I have found this filter that makes pictures look more magical. Colors that somehow reach in and touch me in a spot. A new spot? One I was already courting? Who can say?


CameraBag app
Helga filter

I get curious when reading the app reviews. They say this Helga is trying to be like a Holga. That the app is lame because it could never duplicate the beauty the camera captures. People should really read app reviews. I sit at a desk all day, for my current job, so I did some internet sleuth work. I found the camera pretty quickly. It wasn't that well hidden in the sub-culture webs.

I see the pictures it takes before I see the camera.

I get it!

The pics have that same quality that I was starting to love in the app, but somehow it did feel more right. The colors and tones were more ethereal. I found the camera next. I was surprised at the size and the odd film it took. I looked at the price of the camera. I was tempted to buy it right then. I started to think about 12 shots. Film cost. Processing costs. My bills.

I filled it away for x-mas wish list.

But I kept looking. What's this "Lomography" stuff? A whole Society? They've got so many cameras and I'm already a confused analog film newb. I saw a Supersampler and a Colorsplash on their site. They looked the simplest but with some fun gimmicks.

I had a full x-mas wish list, now.



I read more about them as the holidays neared. I found out about Multiple Exposures as an option or ability of the cameras. I didn't know what they meant. They said it could do multiple exposures... What are they like?

I looked up examples and thought they were interesting but kind of messy. Fun idea, but I wouldn't know how to use it...

Cogs started turning. I thought about combinding things. In my early, no experience in film days, I had all sorts of pie in the sky ideas. I was gonna put people's faces with all sorts of stuff. Mountains, fireworks, animals...

By the time the holidays rolled around, I had assigned each parent a camera I needed. I ordered the SuperSampler before I left for home.

My parents love me! We had that moment of opening up your gift and then explaining to everyone why it is such a cool things and all the stuff you can try and do.

They nod and think it sounds neat.

Meanwhile, I'm searching for batteries and film!

I started shooting that day with the Colorsplash and the Holga 120CFN.

Both cameras come with booklets showing a wide variety of things you can do with them and tips on how to play with them. The Holga 120CFN book had several examples of Multiple Exposures. These were far cooler than what I had seen on browser-based image searches. Perspective shifting on subjects and textures mixed with landscapes.

I loaded both cameras and did what any man does. I started shooting and trying to figure out how it worked as I went. My Holga roll had the square frame it it, but I had the arrow pointing at 16, so all my pics overlapped at the edges.



As you can see, I also didn't understand that overlaying of multiple images would give the film too much light, if you didn't adjust for it. You get busy pictures that all want your attention.

I remember getting my first roll back and being pretty sad. Like asking Santa for a the "Red Rider BB Gun" but getting the rabbit pajamas, instead. I had seen all these magical pictures but none of mine worked and some were down right uninteresting. A few looked ok, but I was crest fallen.

The camera wasn't magic. It didn't make everything I snapped a picture of magical. It captured what I pointed it at. I didn't shoot my second roll as quickly. I did use the Holga off and on, but I was a little discouraged. I think that happens to a lot of people that try this camera for the first time.

I didn't give up. I took my Colorsplash to clubs and parties. I would pop a flash on someone and then use a drag shutter to catch some light trails before it would close. After a few of those types of pics, the flash popped a second time when I released the button. I figured out a way to do a fake doubles on the Colorsplash. I could capture two things at night if I popped the flash on a subject, covered the lens, and then waited till the flash recharged. Then, I would aim it at something different and release the shutter for a second flash.



I had a more portable camera that I could trick, but only at night.


About 3 months later, I was getting frustrated/excited about the possibilities. I liked the Holga, but it was too big to carry with me to things without worrying about it or it getting in the way. I also had little control over the light intake on it. I had modified the aperture arm, but I couldn't really get a handle on the doubles I wanted to do. The Colorsplash was fun, but still a little difficult to pocket and I could only double at night with some effort.

My tax return came in around early-mid March. I had started browsing cameras again. Looking for something on the Lomography site that would get closer to my needs.

The LC-A+ caught my eye. It was supposed to be the one that started it all. It had an ISO adjustment to control light intake. It had a Multiple Exposures (MX) switch, that let you crank the shutter without touching the film advance. It looked smaller and more easy to handle. There were plenty of other features I didn't know I would like, as well. I dropped the money on the one with the original Minitar lens from the Lomo company. It was 30 bones more, but whats 30 when you're already gonna drop 250, right? I wanted to play with the real deal, even if it was made in China.

I got it in about a week later and tore open the package with a restrained reverence while eating lunch. Didn't wait to get home. I bought it at a good time and received 6 rolls of film, 2 tea cups, the LC-A+ book, and cable release, and a Colorsplash flash.

It felt sturdy. It had weight the others hadn't. It felt like something substantial in my hand. Little did I know, this wouldn't leave my side for the next, almost, year and a half. Two exceptions: I left it at my Dad's hotel after a rehearsal wedding dinner for my cousin and one when I was asked to leave a lady's abode rather quickly. Both times I retrieved it before 24hrs. It has become a comfort blanket for me.

I shot my first roll that night, when I went to a show at a theater downtown and then saw a friend's band. I still had no idea what film ISO was. I only knew that you set the dial on the camera to match and the rest wasn't your responsibility. It took me another 2-3 months before I started questioning that part of photography. I finished the roll that night. Here are a few of the shots that I got back the next day.












I was convinced. This camera had the magic I was looking for in the others. It had to be the camera. I hadn't done this cool stuff with anything else. I had no training, classes, or people giving me pointers. It can't be me. I thought this for a few months.I would show people the pictures I was taking and they would say they were pretty neat. Then, I would tell them that it wasn't me. It was the camera. It made things look so cool and it was so easy to use.

I started shooting everything that I thought would look neat. I refused to use my viewfinder. The online folks had said the Holga viewfinder was pointless, due to its positioning. I figured it was the same for the LC-A+ and I shot for the first 6 months without a look through it. I later found out the LC-A+ has a fairly accurate viewfinder. I started using it about half the time. I was going through a roll or two a week and trying out Multiple Exposures on anything that occurred to me as I walked around.

Skip to now. A year and a half later I am way down the rabbit hole. I have 20 plus cameras and most of them can do some multiple exposure work. I've shot over 5000 photos with my LC-A+ & 75% are Multiple Exposures. I, uncertainly, bought a second one, with my last tax return. I kept wondering if buying another instead of investing in; a different camera, film, or processing was the right choice. It was to serve as my primary camera and the original as a backup/loaner/texture roll shooter. My MX switch on the original looks like this, as of 6 months ago:

My fingernail has slowly been shaving the edges off the ridge the switch moves along. My first one's film advance locked two weeks after I got my new one. I sent it off for repair. The universe had spoken, though. I had been right.


A long explanation? Yes. Did you read this far? Now you know my background on this, you can see that I'm fresh to this world of photography and self-taught.

So why do I love Multiple Exposures?

I'm not the first to do it. What amazes me, is that more people aren't doing this. The photo world has been making a steady transition to digital in the last 8 years, now that it is affordable. Everyone is taking pictures of exactly what is there. I could stand in the same spot and take the same picture with the same gear. Being a photographer is becoming more about the right time and place then the art, in my opinion.

I see Multiple Exposures as a way to take the best of two photos and makes something better out of the sum of their parts. Whether its a random double:


or a planned out studio shoot


You end up with something far more magical and unique than they would have been individually.

The way I see it, people have been taking pictures of what's there for over a hundred years. There are a huge amount of amazing pictures from all of this work. I am not saying that I don't get amazed by Ansel Adams or Halsman or Paul Outerbridge. I discover new inspirations from old photography more often. Everyone has their vision of what they want to shoot.

What I don't get, is why more people aren't doing Multiple Exposures photography? Let's take pictures of what we interpret reality to be. I think it's a genre that has a huge room for discovery and expansion. I see amazing shots by people that have mastered this in a way I haven't even grasped, yet. I think it is due to several factors.

It's confusing.
Most people I talk with about multiples, are single exposure photographers and lay people. I explain my methods. I let them know about colors that don't mix. How busy multiples are messy. I send them off with a loaner camera and a confused but eager glint in their eye. They come back with the same things. They didn't know what to mix it with, the images overlap too much and nothing's clear, or they just shot a lot of subject matter that didn't work with each other.It seems like folks either get it or they don't. It's a talent in the same way shooting good or powerful singles shots is an amazing talent. I wish I could shoot the single exposure photos I see done by photographers I admire.

Popular Culture Hasn't Produced A Famous Multiple Exposures Artist
You say, wait! I can name three people off the top of my head. Did you find them on your own? Were you taught about the work they produced while getting your photo degree? The layperson and your average photographer are barely aware of multiple exposure photography. Due to it's recent use in ads on TV and magazine, people are just now becoming aware of Long Exposure Photography. Namely, Light Drawing.


If more people are to explore this medium and help us flesh out new ideas, more of the experts quality work they produce needs to get exposure. You have no idea how many times I've explained what I do, to people. They start out confused and then show vague signs of understanding. The only reason I get that far, is most people with a film camera have accidentally done one or two in their lifetime. They thought it was weird or an ugly mistake and tossed it. No role models exist. Do a quick online search for Multiple Exposure Photographer. You see one photographer's site listed on the first page and his site isn't even active, save for the multiples section. We need the folks at the top of their "Multiples Game" to make themselves more known on the web.

There isn't much info for doing this, on the web
I had to dig through Lomography tipsters and page after page of web searches to find the little bits I did find. Recently I located a fairly detailed guide, but it isn't accompanied by any pictures to illustrate its points and it is the first inch of the tip of the iceberg. They don't cover color affect, shadow usage, cameras that are better for this type of photography, or even the different ways you can set up doubles (ie. In camera or re-shooting a roll you've pre-marked) There are so many photo tutorials out there. Yet, the people with the know how, specialization, and creative juices aren't sharing. All I can think of is poor me starting out. Looking for help on how to do something I was so inflamed about trying and finding little tips, here and there. I am now grateful for the lack of info and the mistakes I've made. I might never have know the tricks, I do now, if I hadn't walked around blindly shooting what I thought would work. I have friends here in Austin, and some online, who think otherwise. They ask me for hints, tips, and suggestions. I am always surprised at how they interpret and what they return. But how many rolls would have produced better results if I hadn't had to feel my way around this?


We need a site. An online compendium of our collective knowledge. The basics, tips, variations, and everything in between. We need artists, who are good at multiple exposures, to share their wisdom and allow us to show/link to their work. There are so many amazing multiple exposure photographers I have run into on flickr. If we could get all of us to create our own page for the site displaying our approach, tricks, and examples, there would be an amazing resource available.

Not just for the new people. We would all benefit from each other. Lately, the only way to know how someone did a cool, shot is to read their flickr notes or e-mail them the question. Not everyone puts down their methods, film type, and settings.

This is a call to arms!


If you love multiple exposures. If you want to get better at it. If you are tired of explaining it to people and seeing their eyes gloss over. If you want to help new people at this brilliant type of photography. Throw your hat in the ring.

Let me know. It won't be an immediate solution. It will take us time and some effort on our part. It might be a year before it is up and running.It might be shorter than that with the right people involved.

That doesn't matter.

Let's do what no one has done before us.

Let's build a site where all can come to discover, help, showcase, and promote Multiple Exposures.

I am willing to reach for it and make it happen if you are.

To add your name to the list of people willing to make the effort and contribute to this, email me at LomoCamRuss@gmail.com I will add you to a list for when we start rolling on this.




I believe we can do this.

Also, I have a website of my own, now. You can contact me there.

www.CamRussPhoto.com


You can also keep up with my photography on my flickr

You can get frequent updates on my process, progress, and showings on my Artist Facebook Page.

Monday, March 8, 2010

Shadows, shades, & darkness: Your Multiple Exposure Paradise





Last time I wrote about double exposures, I tried to cover a broad cross section of approaches. In this entry, I want to talk more about how double exposures work and what you can look for. It is a meditation on darkness, shadow, & black holes.

I had a sit down with some folks last night who were interested in taking better multiple exposure shots. I hadn't realized what I knew versus what other photographers knew about it. I have only shot film for a year and 70% has been multiple exposures. It's the medium I prefer. In talking with these folks, I began to understand what I have come to know, almost innately, about what does and doesn't work for multiple exposures.

Once again, I am no expert. I haven't taken classes or had a chance to work with a mentor. I welcome that, but it hasn't happened yet. I am not saying this is the end all be all of double exposures, but I do think I have a darn good grasp on the subject and part of it comes naturally to me. I know how to make the accidents happen.

Here are a few of the things we discussed and what advice I was able to offer.

+ Film needs light:

What? Of course film needs light. But here is what I'm getting at. On an exposure, if the first shot has solid contrast between light and dark, like a silhouette, then you end up with spots on the negative that haven't gotten any love. It's empty. So what happens on the next exposure? You have a negative space to fill. The rest of the shot has already left its impression.






+ Darker Colors are your friend

When you double your shots you need to decide what you want to be your primary focus. You can blend two images together or use one as a texture. Either way, if you shoot bright yellows, whites, light blues, pastel colors; you will have those colors come through more. Dark blues, greens, reds, browns, and grays; will be muted and lend their textures and form more than a true solid image.





Parking Lot vs Birds at Sunset:

A great example and favorite subject of mine, is asphalt. Streets and parking lots with nice dark blacktop makes for awesome doubles. You can capture parking stripes and a lot of rough texture from these. Depends on how much light you let in on the second exposure. In this one I shot with Fuji MS 100/1000 multi-iso. Shot both at 400 iso. If I had wanted more texture from the parking lot, I would have snagged the sunset at 800 iso. What makes this possible is the small amount of light the asphalt is reflecting back at the lens. Of course, the parking stripes were white, so they showed up without an issue.




Yellow vs Red:

In this shot, you can clearly see the bear through the red colors of the arrow head. The parts that fall into the yellow zone are much harder to see. A good example of the dark vs light colors.




Erica VS Red Dots:

This is a great example of black sucking up light. I shot this cinder block wall during the day. It was painted a matte black with red polka dots. I shot the whole roll at different angles and distances. It was 400 iso film and I shot at 800. Then, that night, I shot Erica at 400 iso using my Colorsplash flash. The red dots stay put while the black fades away and fills up with the 2nd exposure.





Building vs Road Stripe:

A good example of texture but no color from asphalt. The building was well lit and the parking lot stripe is the only color that remains from the first exposure.







Statue vs Plant:

The plant was exposed first, which is why you can see all of it. Then, the silhouette created by me being behind the statue shooting toward the sun created the darkness needed for the plant to stay the primary image. It fills in where it was darkest, but is blown out by the sky around the shadow.





Macy vs Ghost Fish:

This one didn't look that neat to me when I first picked it up from the developers. A second look made me smile. The first picture was of a koi pond at the National Arboretum. The water was so dark, the orange koi was the only thing that came out from the first exposure. The second exposure of Macy taking a picture of the pond made the fish float in front of her.





Brick vs Sky:

This is an example of darker colors helping out. The bricks weren't black but dark reds, maroons, & crimson colors are all going to work, as well. The bricks weren't getting any direct sunlight so they added their texture and image without being to overpowering. The sky was bright in places but the clouds helped to keep the bricks visible. Had it been a bright sky w/o clouds the brinks would be far more subtle.





Lion vs Columns

This one deals more with shadows. In this, the Lion head was on a door that was heavily oxidized. The door it self was too dark to really make its presence known. The columns were very white concrete. They should have blown the lion out of the shot, save for a few subtle features. Instead, because the hall of columns has so much going on with the shadows they create, the lion head comes through clearly wherever the shade is.






Eddie vs Reed Thatch:

In this one, I used a blue flash to bring the whites out on the Eddie Munster stencil. Then, I used an orange flash on the reeds. This pushed the reeds through the black part of the stencil while my first flash held the white part of Eddie in place.





Tile Corner vs Wooten Bldg.:

The darker color tiles in the corner of a restroom that wasn't brightly lit make for a shadowy texture over a well lit day pointing the camera away from the sun.

+ Night time is the right time for doubles

So, obviously, if darker colors and blacks are favorable in double exposures, then night time and clever flash usage should give you great results. You already saw the Erica vs Red Dots picture. That is a prime example. You can control what gets exposed on film better when you control the lighting of your subjects. Neons, Signs, clever flashes on walls and friends; all of these can be used to great effect.






Rickey vs Fire:

A simple example. I shot the bbq pit without a flash. So the fire is the only thing that will really show up. Next I grabbed a shot of Rickey with a green flash. I shot upwards, so I wouldn't catch any background imagery.






Parking vs Parking:

This shot is an inversion. A neon parking sign with a x-mas light covered tree in the background. I shot this once, flipped the camera, and shot again. I was shooting with 400 iso and no flash. I grabbed only the most powerful light in the scene and left all the unnecessary bits out.






Bench vs Ladies:

In hind site, I should have used a yellow or orange flash for one of these exposures. blue and green are too close together and don't differentiate enough. Still, green flash on park bench and blue flash for the ladies. They mesh together a bit, but there isn't anything else left to interfere with the shot composure due to the night time's loving blackness.






Pups vs Roman Candles:

This was a bit more inventive. I shot a whole roll, in my Holga, of roman candles being shot over it and around it. Then, I rewound the film and shot some family members and the like. The dark environment means I can shoot the puppies with a flash and isolate them from their context and layer them over something else.






Mary vs Ceiling:

This one was a combination of dark colors on the ceiling and the angle of my camera & flash. The ceiling gets a more left dominant exposure while Mary gets a blue flash and right dominant placement. So the flash illuminates both corners of the shot due to the way I angle my camera away or towards the subject.






LomoCam vs Bokeh:

I'll admit this one was a complete accident. I took the shot of the giant x-mas light tree above me, unfocused, for the first exposure. Then I used an orange flash for my face. Turns out the flash was blocked by the extension of the SLR lens. So only half my face gets lit. Weird effect you could only have gotten at night.






Unknown Lady vs Wire Chair vs Metal Mesh Wall Covered in Moss:

So this is a triple. Which is why the gal's face is all blown out white. Too much light at the center of the shot after 3 exposures, I guess. Blue flash for the woman, Yellow flash for the chair, & green for the metal mesh wall covered in moss. Each is able to be isolated and added to the shot with a flash because the night conceals what your flash doesn't touch.



In the end, these are just basics. Ideas to grow from. I'm not telling you to shoot the way I shoot. Just use this to understand how your environment responds to color and light for layering shots. The only way I figured all this out was shooting loads of film and searching through other's double exposures on flickr.

Yesterday was my 1 yr anniversary of shooting on my LC-A+RL. The camera that truly gave me a handle on double exposures and helped me refine my methods. I have taken over 3700 pictures with this Lomo in the last 12 months. 75% were doubles. I love this camera and I dedicate this blog entry to it's glory and magic it brings out of my life. Keep Snapping Shutters! Make your pictures worth 2000 words.